The Community Law Center, Inc.

 
 

About the Law CenterPublicationsJoin Us!

HOME

"We Buy Houses" Illegal Sign Information

How to Start a Nonprofit Organization Manual 5th Edition

Law Center and City Clean Up Drug-Infested Apartment Complex

Don't forget to check out our useful links page!

Filing  a Complaint Against A Mortgage Loan Servicer 

Board of Directors

Staff

 

 

Contact Us
Community Law Center
3355 Keswick Road, Suite 200
Baltimore, MD 21211
 
Phone: (410) 366-0922
Fax: (410) 366-7763

Monthly News Highlights

 April 1999


A Victory Restraining Vicious Pitbulls

Neighborhoods can be terrorized by vicious dogs. Sometimes they roam freely. Sometimes they are on the end of a leash held by someone who uses them as a weapon to intimidate people. However, when the Animal Control Inspector shows up, the dogs are in the house.

In the Rossiter Avenue neighborhood, the children of the 500 block of Rossiter Avenue were afraid to play in their yards because of three pitbulls who lived on their street. The dogs had been trained to be fighters.

In 1998, the Animal Control ordinance of the Baltimore City code was amended to allow residents to take action when confronted with vicious dogs. With the representation of the Law Center Pro Bono Project Director, Amelia Lazarus, the residents on the block filed affidavits with Animal Control. The dogs were impounded. As a result of Ms Lazarus' diligence, the Vicious Dog Hearing Board was created. This case was their first hearing. It took five hours and included 31 exhibits and 13 witnesses..

By this time, the dog owners had moved, but still, the Board found the three dogs to be 'vicious' under the definition of the law and placed substantial requirements on the owners, e.g. the dogs had to be neutered, they could not be given away or sold, and they had to wear 'basket' type muzzles when not in the house or an enclosed yard.

Good job Amelia and the residents of Rossiter Avenue!


Community Bill of Rights - Update

To have clout, communities need the ability to go to court, in their own name and right, to address the nuisance conditions in their neighborhoods. Who better, than the residents, knows the problems and can monitor the remedies?

The Community Bill of Rights was first enacted in 1996, after four years of effort by the Law Center. (Md. Ann. Code, RP §14-123.) However, the requirements for a community to be eligible to use the law were so restrictive, hardly any community in the City qualified.

This year, as a result of the hard work of Bryan Alston, Paralegal at the Law Center, we have succeeded in having the General Assembly amend the definition of community association. Assuming the Governor signs the bill, as of October, 1999, a community need only meet reasonable requirements, including having at least 25 households as dues paying members, to have standing under the Community Bill of Rights.

Turning a Problem Into a Positive

The residents of Boyd/Booth continue to work long and hard to re-claim their neighborhood from drug dealers and thugs by addressing public safety and re-building their community.

As part of their strategy, the first focus area for development are the 1900 and 2000 blocks of Hollins Street. The community - with the help of housing developers, City agencies, and the Law Center - plans to address each house in the focus area to transform the entire area into an attractive location for home buyers.

The owner of a key property in this focus area sought zoning approval to re-open a corner grocery store. The community feared that this enterprise could feed directly into re-kindling the open air drug market on that corner.

Residents recognized that a store on that coroner could be a positive contribution to the redevelopment effort; it did not have to fuel illegal activity. Represented by Law Center Staff Attorney Kristine Dunkerton, residents entered into negotiations with the owner for a mutually beneficial solution.

In exchange for the community support, the owner agreed to restrictive hours of operation, defensible space initiatives - such as a video camera and flood lights, and to make the video film available to the Police and the community, as well as other improvements. Furthermore, if there is a dispute as to whether the owner is fulfilling the agreement, he has agreed to submit to binding arbitration or be subject to court action.

Finally, the Board of Municipal Zoning appeals included the agreement as stipulations in the zoning resolution allowing him to re-open the store. This means these requirements will be in place no matter who owns the store in the future.


Contact Us  Publications Home Donations

    Unable to open links e-mail to mail@communitylaw.org

To add your neighborhood to our links page click here

    The Community Law Center Website is under construction please watch for updates

 

Last Updated: September 25, 2006 © 2006 Community Law Center, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland